
Fairness auditing for candidate-job matching, recommendation systems, and talent marketplace algorithms.
Matching algorithms determine which candidates see which jobs—and which employers see which candidates. These invisible gatekeepers shape career opportunities for millions, but their decision-making processes are often opaque and biased.
When algorithms are trained on historical hiring data, they learn to replicate past patterns— including discriminatory ones. They may use features like location, education, or work history that serve as proxies for protected characteristics.
We test matching algorithms to expose hidden biases and help you build fairer talent systems.

Common fairness issues we test for in matching and recommendation algorithms
Algorithms trained on past hiring data may perpetuate historical discrimination patterns.
Features like zip code, university, or club memberships may serve as proxies for race or class.
If biased recommendations lead to biased hires, the system learns to reinforce its own biases.
Some candidates may never see relevant jobs because the algorithm never shows them.
AI may incorrectly infer skills from job titles, penalizing non-traditional career paths.
Algorithms may over-weight recent experience, disadvantaging career returners.
A rigorous approach to evaluating algorithmic fairness in matching systems
Understand the features, weights, and logic driving matching decisions.
Test how changes in protected characteristics affect match recommendations.
Statistical analysis of which candidate groups see which opportunities.
Apply multiple fairness criteria to identify discrimination patterns.
Quantified evidence of any discriminatory patterns in matching outcomes.
Identification of features that may serve as proxies for protected characteristics.
Actionable recommendations for improving algorithmic fairness.
Discover what biases might be shaping your talent recommendations.
Request Assessment